Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP)
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington , DC 20460-0001
Docket ID Control Number OPP 2005-0162
Re: Furadan on Cotton
Over the past 40 years I have consulted on row crops in Mississippi. I have
owned my own business, Price Agriculture & Entomology Service, Inc. , for 38
years. My son received his Master degree from Mississippi State University in
2002 in Entomology and
Plant Pathology and joined the business. We take care of cotton, corn,
soybeans, sweet potatoes, and wheat in Tallahatchie, Panola, and Quitman
counties.
Cotton is our main crop and we service over 24,000 acres and 34 farmers. Cotton
is a high input crop with seed, fertilizer, fuel, chemicals, and technology fees
rising each year. It is a challenge for farmers to make a profit and stay in
business. In the area we work farmers plant over 80% GMO seed. This
technology is not cheap and will get more expensive with newer technology
coming down the pipeline. Example: Bollgard II/Flex,
Widestrike/Flex or Flex alone the stacked varieties are $65.00 to 70.00 dollars per
acre.
I am sure most of you are aware that when BT Cotton was introduced in 1996 it
did a great job on resistant Tobacco Budworms. Now that we are not making
multiple applications to control this pest we are seeing a shift in the pest
population. The so called
?secondary pest? such as plant bugs, mites, aphids, white fly and armyworms
have moved to the forefront.
In my business we have always tried to use a good pest management approach.
We try and alternate chemistry as much as possible. The problem with this type
of program is that we do not have much new chemistry available to us. The real
concern is not many companies are working on new chemisty to control this
pest.
In Mississippi our research group at Stoneville has documented plant bug
resistance to pyrethroids and organophosphate materials. We are now seeing
problems with the neonicotinoids not controlling aphids. We are using maximum
rates to try and control plant bugs and aphids. These neonicotinoids are not
cheap when used alone and if you tank-mix these products with a product like
Diamond (IGR?S), the cost per acre can double. Example: 2 oz. Centric alone -
$8.00 to $8.50 per acre
2 oz. Centric + 6 oz. Diamond - $ 14.00 to $ 15.00 per
acre
The past few years aphids are becoming harder to control and much more
expensive to the farmer without the use of Furadan. In years past where Furadan
has been available we have only had to use it one or two applications season
long. I can remember using only one application to ?crash? aphid populations.
The past year we had to wait on the fungus to take out aphids and some farms did
not get rain to take the honey dew and mold off the plant. The grower had to deal
with sticky cotton, wrapped spindles and grade issues. Furadan is a product I
feel could fit well into our Insect Resistance Management program and save our
farmers a lot of money in the process. In the past Furadan has been priced at
$4.00 per acre, and if used alone is a $4.00 savings over a full rate of
neonicotinoids. In 2006 the final planted cotton acres in Mississippi was
1,210.00. At $4.00 per acre that is a savings of $4,840,000.00 on one
application. If you start adding discounts for grades, due to mold on the lint, down
time with a six row cotton picker, and dealing with ?sticky cotton?, the cost to the
farmer continues to climb. Mills are starting to demand higher quality cotton and
Furadan could easily solve some of the issues our farmers face during harvest and
make possible the sale of a quality cotton crop.
I am writing on behalf of my company and the farmers we service. I am not writing
formally on behalf of our Mississippi Agricultural Consultant Association but I have
talked to many of our members and many see the need for the use of Furadan. I
know that I can honestly say for me and for many MACA members that if we get
this product back, we will be good stewards of this product.
Best regards,
Bill Price, Jr.
Comment submitted by B. Price
This is comment on Notice
Carbofuran; Interim Reregistration Eligibility Decision; Extension of Comment Period
View Comment
Related Comments
View AllPublic Submission Posted: 11/03/2006 ID: EPA-HQ-OPP-2005-0162-0367
Nov 30,2006 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 11/03/2006 ID: EPA-HQ-OPP-2005-0162-0368
Nov 30,2006 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 11/06/2006 ID: EPA-HQ-OPP-2005-0162-0369
Nov 30,2006 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 11/06/2006 ID: EPA-HQ-OPP-2005-0162-0371
Nov 30,2006 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 11/07/2006 ID: EPA-HQ-OPP-2005-0162-0373
Nov 30,2006 11:59 PM ET