eLaws | eCases | United States Code | Federal Courts |
Home » Rulemaking » Comment submitted by J. Ball

Comment submitted by J. Ball

Document ID: EPA-HQ-OPP-2005-0163-0069
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Environmental Protection Agency
Received Date: June 29 2006, at 03:52 PM Eastern Daylight Time
Date Posted: June 30 2006, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: June 30 2006, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: July 20 2006, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 80193565
View Document:  View as format xml

View Comment

We have been using Temik in our Sugar Beet production for a number of years. It is very effective for controling the pests in our beet fields. It is a very valuable tool . Re-registration of temik will help the sugar industry many fold over. Our domestic wells have been tested and there was not a trace of temik found.

Related Comments

    View All
Total: 90
Comment submitted by J. Miller, University of Idaho
Public Submission    Posted: 06/20/2006     ID: EPA-HQ-OPP-2005-0163-0064

Jul 20,2006 11:59 PM ET
Comment submitted by R. Spear
Public Submission    Posted: 06/22/2006     ID: EPA-HQ-OPP-2005-0163-0065

Jul 20,2006 11:59 PM ET
Comment submitted by M. Aerts, Florida Fruit and Vegetable Association
Public Submission    Posted: 06/27/2006     ID: EPA-HQ-OPP-2005-0163-0066

Jul 20,2006 11:59 PM ET
Comment submitted by M. Shaw
Public Submission    Posted: 06/28/2006     ID: EPA-HQ-OPP-2005-0163-0068

Jul 20,2006 11:59 PM ET
Comment submitted by J. Ball
Public Submission    Posted: 06/30/2006     ID: EPA-HQ-OPP-2005-0163-0069

Jul 20,2006 11:59 PM ET