Comment submitted by J. Public

WHY DO CONSUMERS COME LAST BY THE EPA? NOTICE LISTS ALL THE PROFITEERS WITH CONSUMERS LAST ON THE NOTICE LIST. EPA DOES NOT CITE ANY FACTS ON "LIMITED USE" OF FLUORID, YET IT WRITES THAT THERE IS "LIMITED USE". WHERE ARE THE FACT ON THE "LIMITED USE" THAT EPA CLAIMS. 1 DROP IN GREAT SALT LAKE OF FLUORIDE WOULD PUT THE LAKE OVER SAFE LIMIT. DO NOT ALLOW CONTINUED USE OF THIS PRODUCT. FLUORIDE RISK IS MUCH HIGHER THAN EPA IS REQUIRING AS A MINIMUM AND THE TOLERANCES NEED TO BE MUCH LOWER. EPA WORKS FOR BUSINESS, PROFITEERING AND NOT FOR PEOPLE'S HEALTH. EPA IS A WIMP WHEN CONGRESS CALLS AND WANTS TO DO FAVORS FOR THEIR PALS/CAMPAIGN DONORS. THERE IS EXPOSURE AT DENTIS, AT TOOTHPASTE, IN VACCINES AND IN THIS FARM PROUCT USE. AUTISM IS THE RESULT NAD AUTISM IS AN EPIDEMIC. DOW IS A PROFITEER ON MAKING MONEY AND CARES NOT ONE WHIT ABOUT THE DAMAGE THEY DO TO PEOPLE'S HEALTH. ALL DOW CARES ABOUT IS PROFITS AND THEIR COMMENTS HAVE THAT BEHIND WHAT THEY SAY. TOLERANCE SHOULD BE REDUCED. I DO NOT BELIEVE THAT FLUORIDE IS "SAFER" THAN PHOSPINE. I BELIEVE CHEAPNESS IS WHAT THE CMOPANYS AND PROFITEERS WANT. NOT SAFETY. THE PUBLIC DOES NOT KNOW ABOUT THE USE IN NUTS AND DRIED FRUIT.I BELIEVE THAT LABELS SHOULD BE PUT ON ANY PRODUCT STORED WITH THIS TOXIC CHEMICAL IN IT. THE LABEL SHOULD SHOW THE PRODUCT AFFECTED WITH POLLUTION. IF ON THE LABEL, YOU WOULD SEE SALES PLUMMET. WE NEED AN AGENCY THAT WORKS FOR HEALTH. NOT ONE THAT WORKS FOR PROFITEERING. EPA IS NOT DOING A JOB FOR AMERICA.