Comment submitted by B. Sachau

public comment on federal rgister of 8/23/06 vol 71 #163 pg 49350 epa 40 cfr part l80 docket 2006 0165 frl 8079-3 ir-4/rutgers - what is their connection to nj being cancer alley? any? i objecft to this proposal. i request a hearing and further investigation. i think the only residue allowed should be .00001. i think the risk method epa uses is faulty and defective and does not protect americans. this is a possible human carcinogen. the cancer patients out there would ask that you stop allowing all of this human health hazard to exist in this country. i object to this product being unleashed on this country. the people here are not being adequately protected by epa. look at how they told the country it was safe to go back into the world trade center pollution. b. sachau 15 elm st florham park nj 07932