October 04, 2006
Lance Wormell
Special Review and Reregistration Division (7508P)
Office of Pesticide Programs
Environmental Protection Agency
1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.
Washington, DC 20460-0001
wormell.lance@epa.gov
RE: Docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2006-0201
I am the Director of Maintenance at the Legacy Golf Links and Fox Creek Golf
Club in Smyrna, Georgia. I am requesting that the EPA reconsider its recent
decision to cancel registration of the organic arsenical herbicides (MSMA, DSMA,
and CMA) in the turfgrass market. In my role as superintendent, I am responsible
for providing healthy turf that has minimal weed issues at my golf course. This is
necessary in order to meet the demands of our customers as my facility is
located in a very competitive golf market.
MSMA products are an important part of my weed control program because of
their effectiveness and affordability. For bermudagrass, no comparable substitute
for the organic arsenical herbicides is available. No control alternatives exist for a
number of weeds. Lack of suitable control is especially true for dallisgrass.
EPA acknowledges there is no direct replacement for the MSMA selective control
of broadleaf and grass weeds in golf course turf. However, the agency has
developed a proposed list of alternative herbicide treatments using two to three
herbicides. EPA has pointed out these proposed alternatives may be cost
prohibitive and I wholeheartedly concur with this statement. MSMA is a very
affordable and low cost herbicide. The proposed list of alternatives will be cost
prohibitive to my facility and would provide an ineffective means of dealing with
tough annual weed growth in turf. Current use restrictions of proposed alternatives
are quite problematic.
As the Director of maintenance at Legacy Golf Links and Fox Creek Golf Club, I
give high priority to maintenance practices that do not have a negative impact on
the environment. Meeting or exceeding the expectations of our customers, while
ensuring golf's compatibility with the natural environment, is fundamental for the
financial success of my facility and a high priority for me personally.
I respectfully suggest that EPA consider restricting the use of organic arsenical
herbicides on soil types with the greatest potential for organic arsenical leaching,
but not ban them from those soils with little or no leaching potential.
I ask that the EPA take into consideration my comments as a user of this product
when making your final assessment. Removal of MSMA from the market will have
a significant financial impact on the golf industry and my facility specifically.
Thank you for allowing me to express my concerns with this decision and I highly
encourage this re-registration decision to be reconsidered.
Sincerely,
Kurt L. Russell, GCS
Director of Maintenance
Legacy Golf
Comment submitted by K. Russell, Legacy Golf Links
This is comment on Notice
Organic Arsenical Herbicides MSMA, DSMA, CAMA, and Cacodylic Acid, Reregistration Eligibility Decision; Extension of Comment Period
View Comment
Related Comments
View AllPublic Submission Posted: 10/04/2006 ID: EPA-HQ-OPP-2006-0201-0162
Nov 09,2006 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 10/05/2006 ID: EPA-HQ-OPP-2006-0201-0164
Nov 09,2006 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 10/05/2006 ID: EPA-HQ-OPP-2006-0201-0166
Nov 09,2006 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 10/05/2006 ID: EPA-HQ-OPP-2006-0201-0167
Nov 09,2006 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 10/05/2006 ID: EPA-HQ-OPP-2006-0201-0168
Nov 09,2006 11:59 PM ET