As I have already provided considerable information for this section 18 request, I
will try to keep my comments brief. Recent actions have made this section 18
even more critical. Two previously efficacious products have been, or are in the
process of being, removed for this market. DuPont has declined support for
renewal of a section 18 for use of Avaunt on collards, and DOW is removing the
leafy Brassica crop group from the SpinTor label in Georgia. These actions are
being taken for resistance management in diamondback moth. This leaves our
producers with a single new chemistry (Proclaim) and several older chemistries
(B.t.s, Lannate, Endosulfan). This will result in severe resistance pressure on
Proclaim, and it is not likely that any product would last long under those
conditions (our experience with SpinTor being the first of the new products on the
market and the severe resistance that has occurred provides evidence of this
problem). B.t.s are already heavily used in resistance management, but can not
provide adequate crop protection under the pest pressure experienced in south
Georgia. Renewed use of Lannate (and to a lesser degree Endosulfan) generally
provides good control for a short period of time before resistance reappears. In the
absence of a section 18 for Tesoro, the likely scenario will be heavy selection
pressure for resistance to the few products we have available, followed by
increased use as these products as they become less efficacious, followed by
control failures and severe losses in all crops attacked by diamondback moth.
It is my understanding that EPA has some concerns about potential ecological
effects of Tesoro. While I am not fully qualified to address these concerns, I would
encourage evaluation of these concerns in comparison to the likely impact of
alternatives in actual production practices (heavy use of Proclaim and Lannate and
likely heavy use of endosulfan) rather than an unrealistic evaluation compared to
no potential environmental or health effects.
Comment submitted by A. N. Sparks, Georgia Cooperative Extension
This is comment on Notice
Pyridalyl; Receipt of Application for Emergency Exemption, Solicitation of Public Comment
View Comment
Related Comments
View AllPublic Submission Posted: 08/11/2006 ID: EPA-HQ-OPP-2006-0530-0003
Aug 28,2006 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 08/25/2006 ID: EPA-HQ-OPP-2006-0530-0005
Aug 28,2006 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 08/25/2006 ID: EPA-HQ-OPP-2006-0530-0006
Aug 28,2006 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 08/28/2006 ID: EPA-HQ-OPP-2006-0530-0008
Aug 28,2006 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 08/28/2006 ID: EPA-HQ-OPP-2006-0530-0009
Aug 28,2006 11:59 PM ET