Comment submitted by B. Sachau

PUBLIC COMMENT ON FEDERAL REGISTER OF 4/25/07 VOL 72 #79 DOCKET 2006-0643-0002 EXEMPT FROM REQUIREMENT OF TOLERANCE UNDER FFDCA FOR RESIDUE OF PLANT VIRUS COAT PROTEINS THAT ARE PART OF PLANT INCORPORATED ALLEGED PROTECTANTS (NEWSPEAK FOR FOREIGN MATTER ADDED BY MANKIND TO PLANTS ORIGINALLY DESIGNED BY GOD) this is an added substance foreign to the naturalness and wholeness of the plant itself so i believe the new term is propagandaese designed and devised to avoid the strangeness of the substance added to the natural plant. for this reason, use of this new term seems like a "catch 22" type avoidance of the truth. it seems the new term is designed to put bureaucratese spin on what is actually happening to the natural plant. it is an added foreign manmade substance, not of God's design. The rest of america recognizes that. epa, in the grip of chemical experimenters, seems to not understand that natural, organic plants are what we need to have. anyTHING ADDED TO THE PLANT NEEDS TO BE UNDERSTOOD AND CORRECT LANGUAGE NEEDS TO BE USED. I DO NOT FAVOR THIS NEW TERM AT ALL AND BELIEVE IT WAS DEVISED BY SOMEBODY SEEKING TO DECEIVE THE PUBLIC. I WANT MY CHILDREN AND THEIR CHILDREN TO UNDERSTAND GOD'S PLANTS AND NATURAL PLANTS. WHEN MANKIND ADDS TO THAT PLANT SOMETHING HE BELIEVES IS GOOD BUT WHICH MAY IN FACT KILL, INJURE, OR DESTROY, THEN THAT PLANT ADDITION SHOULD BE CLEARLY DELINEATED IN CORRECT VERBIAGE AND ENGLISH LANGUAGE - NOT IN SOME DOUBLESPEAK. THIS IS AN UNDESIRABLE CHANGE AND SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED. NOTHING SHOULD BE EXEMPT FROM A TOLERANCE AND THE TOLERANCE SHOULD BE 0.00000000. B. SACHAU 15 ELM ST FLORHAM PARK NJ 07932