public comment on federal register of 12/6/06 vol 71 #234 pg 70703 epa 40 cfr l80
frl 8104-1 docket 2006-0731 phenylamine
there should be zero residue, zero exemptions. 90 days testing on rats is so
negligent a standard to say something is "safe". human testing is what counts
and what is important and what this toxic chemical does long term to humans is
what counts. this agency has done absolutely NOTHING to prove this toxic
chemical safe on that count. testing on animals is negligent and proves nothing.
remember Thalidomide which tested just fine on animals and took the arms and
legs off people.
the public has far higher level of concern for its safety than this agency does. this
agency is the one that said the air around ground zero was "safe" to breathe - the
public is dying from that air now.
there should be zero ppm only.
residues left in drinking water are of great concern to me and every other
american. i think the staff at epa should drink water with the residue from this
chemical for the next 20 years before calling it safe.
the standards at this agency are far far too low for approval. it is clear the
profiteers of toxic chemicals are in control at this agency with these low
standards, in my opinion.
b. sachau
15 elm st
florham park nj 07932
Comment submitted by B. Sachau
This is comment on Proposed Rule
Diphenylamine; Proposed Pesticide Tolerance
View Comment
Related Comments
Public Submission Posted: 12/06/2006 ID: EPA-HQ-OPP-2006-0731-0003
Feb 05,2007 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 12/20/2006 ID: EPA-HQ-OPP-2006-0731-0004
Feb 05,2007 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 12/20/2006 ID: EPA-HQ-OPP-2006-0731-0005
Feb 05,2007 11:59 PM ET