eLaws | eCases | United States Code | Federal Courts |
Home » Rulemaking » Comment submitted by B. Sachau

Comment submitted by B. Sachau

Document ID: EPA-HQ-OPP-2007-0346-0009
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Environmental Protection Agency
Received Date: August 01 2007, at 06:47 PM Eastern Daylight Time
Date Posted: August 29 2007, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: August 1 2007, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: August 31 2007, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 802710fb
View Document:  View as format xml

View Comment

PUBLIC COMMENT ON DOCKET 2007-0346 - BOTH BT APPLICATIONS MONSANTO HAS SOME PRIOR CITATIONS FROM THE US GOVERNMENT WHERE THEY HAD TO PAY FINES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL PROBLEMS, DONT THEY? DOESNT THAT MAKE THE GOVT AGENCIES LOOK TWICE WHEN THIS COMPANY WITH A KNOWN LESS THAN STELLAR PAST ASKS FOR EXEMPTIONS? I BELIEVE THERE SHOULD BE NO EXEMPTION AT ALL FOR EITHER OF THESE BT APPLICATIONS. I BELIEVE THERE SHOULD CERTIANLY BE NO PERMANENT EXEMPTIONS. I BELIEVE THAT BT HAS HARMFUL EFFECTS AND THIS FULL SCALE ATTEMPT TO ALLOW THIS KIND OF PLANT AFFECTOR MAY IN TIME LEAD TO PROBLEMS FOR AMERICA. WE DONT NEED TO RUSH. WE NEED THIS COMPANY TO DO MORE TESTING. LIKE LONG TIME 20 YEAR TESTING BEFORE IT IS MANUFACTURED OR SOLD. B. SACHAU 15 ELM ST FLORHAM PARK NJ 07932

Related Comments

   
Total: 1
Comment submitted by B. Sachau
Public Submission    Posted: 08/29/2007     ID: EPA-HQ-OPP-2007-0346-0009

Aug 31,2007 11:59 PM ET