Comment submitted by B. Sachau

this agency should be called the environmental non protctive agency. in l7 years, i dont believe one application for producing toxic chemicals has been turned down, has it? certainly shows the profiteers are doing something right with this agency. i believe the delayed ossification and tail abnormality in rats and the potential for dermal exposure for children is sufficient to deny this product being approved. i also dont like the increased liver weight in dogs. i think the epa is much too generous in approving these applications when the epa itself does no long term studies or combinant studies to verify what is told by profiteers.