Comment submitted by R. Attoe

Document ID: EPA-HQ-OPP-2007-1008-0021
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Environmental Protection Agency
Received Date: January 03 2008, at 02:37 AM Eastern Standard Time
Date Posted: January 3 2008, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: October 31 2007, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: March 27 2008, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 80381ce6
View Document:  View as format xml

View Comment

This is a huge mistake. It is unnecessary to put endorsements on what is essentially a safety label. This certainly is evidence of big money's influence in our government agencies. This doesn't benefit the consumer in any way. It only gives corporations another avenue through which to mislead the consumer. Don't get me wrong, I think advertising is great, but this is supposed to be about safety. These are poisons. Let's start thinking about our children, and whether the small triangular warning on the beautiful bottle with a photo of an attractive person will really dissuade them. Thank you for your time.

Related Comments

    View All
Total: 113
Comment submitted by Charles Boyd, Bayer CropScience
Public Submission    Posted: 12/31/2007     ID: EPA-HQ-OPP-2007-1008-0020

Mar 27,2008 11:59 PM ET
Comment submitted by R. Attoe
Public Submission    Posted: 01/03/2008     ID: EPA-HQ-OPP-2007-1008-0021

Mar 27,2008 11:59 PM ET
Comment submitted by Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility
Public Submission    Posted: 01/03/2008     ID: EPA-HQ-OPP-2007-1008-0022

Mar 27,2008 11:59 PM ET
Comment submitted by Susan Vaughan, EACH - Encouraging Alternatives to Chemical Hazards
Public Submission    Posted: 02/05/2008     ID: EPA-HQ-OPP-2007-1008-0023

Mar 27,2008 11:59 PM ET
Comment submitted by M. Vinsel
Public Submission    Posted: 02/05/2008     ID: EPA-HQ-OPP-2007-1008-0024

Mar 27,2008 11:59 PM ET