Although ultimately I am in favor of all pesticide residues being removed from food,
I will support any regulation that limits the amount of pesticides left on food to the
absolute minimum that the EPA believes is safe. Because of this I am in favor of
the proposed regulation for lychee and startfruit that will set the level of
Chlorothalonil residue tolerance at 15 ppm and 3.0 ppm, respectively. I appreciate
the EPA testing and determining the safe levels of pesticide residue for foods and
feel it is better than no tolerance limits at all. The EPA has the power and
resources to test what is safe for the American people and between the EPA and
the growers of food, we are at your mercy, unless we are to solely purchase
organic produce, which at this time is cost prohibitive or inconvenient for most
consumers. Ideally, I would like the USDA to eliminate pesticide use all together,
which would make our food safer and eliminate the money and time spent testing
what are safe levels of pesticide residues. According to the proposed regulation
document the EPA has “classified Chlorothalonil as a likely human carcinogen by
all routes of exposure” and this is of great concern. I understand that the EPA
testing of residue at the tolerance levels suggested falls under the level of concern
for cancer, but that is still difficult to understand when the chemical itself has been
classified as an agent that produces cancer.
I would like to take this opportunity to bring up a concern having to do with
pesticide use on the fruits and vegetables we eat. The testing that was done for
Chlorothalonil is just one of the chemicals used in many different kinds of
pesticides. According to one website, 41 pesticide residues were found on apples
tested and 57 pesticide residues were found on lettuce samples. (Please see the
following website:
http://encyclopedia.stateuniversity.com/pages/17121/pesticide.html. My
concern is that the aggregate amount of chemical residues that are left on our food
or penetrate our food can be increasingly dangerous to humans in the form of
cancers occurring. I do not see anywhere in this proposed regulation that
addresses the aggregate use of chemicals or if this issue is addressed anywhere
at all. Due to my concern about pesticide use, I purchase organic produce
whenever possible. I would also support the USDA and EPA in any measures that
would increase the efficiency and use of organic farming.
In conclusion, I am in favor of any regulation that will limit the amount of residue on
the food we eat to the lowest amount possible, but if the EPA and USDA are truly
concerned about the safety of the American people, they will review eliminating the
use of pesticides all together and support organic farming to be a cost effective
commercial success.
Comment submitted by R. Apricio
This is comment on Proposed Rule
Chlorothalonil; Proposed Pesticide Tolerance
View Comment
Related Comments
Public Submission Posted: 12/04/2008 ID: EPA-HQ-OPP-2007-1106-0009
Feb 02,2009 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 01/21/2009 ID: EPA-HQ-OPP-2007-1106-0010
Feb 02,2009 11:59 PM ET