Comment submitted by J. Goessling

Document ID: EPA-HQ-OPP-2010-0197-0036
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Environmental Protection Agency
Received Date: July 26 2011, at 12:00 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Date Posted: July 28 2011, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: July 13 2011, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: August 17 2011, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 80ecce5a
View Document:  View as format xml

View Comment

Greetings: I fully support the proposal to collect ENM data under the FIFRA Act, Section 6(a)(2). This statute provides the most efficient and effective way to gather data for both pre and post market assessment and surveillance of ENMs in pesticides. The EPA should determine which part of the submitted information and test data must be made public to enable peer-reviewed studies of the data to assess public and environmental health effects. The EPA shouls also make a public determination about the claims of each nanotech developer that such data should be classified as confidential business information and exempt from public review. Thank you for your time.

Related Comments

    View All
Total: 148
Anonymous public comment
Public Submission    Posted: 07/28/2011     ID: EPA-HQ-OPP-2010-0197-0033

Aug 17,2011 11:59 PM ET
Comment submitted by F. Kirschenmann
Public Submission    Posted: 07/28/2011     ID: EPA-HQ-OPP-2010-0197-0034

Aug 17,2011 11:59 PM ET
Comment submitted by N. Lind
Public Submission    Posted: 07/28/2011     ID: EPA-HQ-OPP-2010-0197-0035

Aug 17,2011 11:59 PM ET
Comment submitted by J. Goessling
Public Submission    Posted: 07/28/2011     ID: EPA-HQ-OPP-2010-0197-0036

Aug 17,2011 11:59 PM ET
Anonymous public comment
Public Submission    Posted: 07/28/2011     ID: EPA-HQ-OPP-2010-0197-0037

Aug 17,2011 11:59 PM ET