Anonymous public comment

Document ID: EPA-HQ-OPP-2010-0197-0037
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Environmental Protection Agency
Received Date: July 26 2011, at 12:00 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Date Posted: July 28 2011, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: July 13 2011, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: August 17 2011, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 80eccf07
View Document:  View as format xml

View Comment

I strongly support collecting ENM data under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA),section 6 (a). Furthermore, I agree with the EPA that this statute provides the most efficient and effective way to gather data both for pre-market safety assessment and post-market surveillance of ENMs in pesticides. I believe the EPA should determine which part of the submitted information and test data must be made public to enable peer-reviewed studies of the data to assess public and environmental health effects. The EPA should make a public determination about each nanotech developer claim that such information and data should be classified as Confidential Business information, exempt from public review.

Related Comments

    View All
Total: 148
Anonymous public comment
Public Submission    Posted: 07/28/2011     ID: EPA-HQ-OPP-2010-0197-0033

Aug 17,2011 11:59 PM ET
Comment submitted by F. Kirschenmann
Public Submission    Posted: 07/28/2011     ID: EPA-HQ-OPP-2010-0197-0034

Aug 17,2011 11:59 PM ET
Comment submitted by N. Lind
Public Submission    Posted: 07/28/2011     ID: EPA-HQ-OPP-2010-0197-0035

Aug 17,2011 11:59 PM ET
Comment submitted by J. Goessling
Public Submission    Posted: 07/28/2011     ID: EPA-HQ-OPP-2010-0197-0036

Aug 17,2011 11:59 PM ET
Anonymous public comment
Public Submission    Posted: 07/28/2011     ID: EPA-HQ-OPP-2010-0197-0037

Aug 17,2011 11:59 PM ET