Anonymous public comment

Document ID: EPA-HQ-OPP-2012-0134-0008
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Environmental Protection Agency
Received Date: April 17 2013, at 12:00 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Date Posted: April 19 2013, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: April 17 2013, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: June 17 2013, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 1jx-84tu-xkab
View Document:  View as format xml

View Comment

this may be in the human diet, but not in the profusion and magnified way it will be if used in the soil and on plants. that exposure is magnified 2000 times or more. i believe that huge exposure may be unsafe. ths product needs more regulations and this profiteer is attempting to get away with lax regulations that could injure the american public. shut down this proposal. i do not support this petition. what the product does in rates is not what the product can do to humans, who are not rats? the only tolerance allowed should be 00000.0000000i notice there are no guaranteesof safety in this petition. the people of the us want greater guarantees than this statement: "product is not expected to". when it kills people, you can say "we didnt expect it to". that is not a good enough guarantee to make the american people into guinea pigs. the weasel statements of this petition are no guarantee of safety. epa has massed thousands of pesticides that are in the bodies of americans right now killing them with cancer and other diseases. epa does not use enough protection. the europeen principle of dont approve if unless the profiteer proves it safe needs to be used. the usa population is tired of being used as lab rats.

Related Comments

   
Total: 1
Anonymous public comment
Public Submission    Posted: 04/19/2013     ID: EPA-HQ-OPP-2012-0134-0008

Jun 17,2013 11:59 PM ET