Document Control Office (7407M)
Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics (OPPT)
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
1200 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20460-0001
RE: Docket EPA ? HQ-OPPT-2004-0126
To Whom It May Concern:
The Illinois Lead Safe Housing Task Force thanks the EPA for the opportunity to
offer the following comments on the proposed brochure ?Protect Your Family From
Lead During Renovation, Repair, and Painting? which is referenced under the
Docket above. The Task Force is an alliance of public, private, and not-for-profit
groups including community-based organizations, property management and
realtor associations, the insurance industry, federal, state and local public health
and housing agencies, universities, children?s health and welfare advocates,
tenant organizers, physicians, attorneys and parents of children who have been
lead poisoned
The EPA has taken a very important step in informing renters and homeowners
that the remodeling or renovation work that is about to begin in their dwelling may
expose the residents to dangerous levels of lead and what they should expect
from the contractor. The Task Force applauds the planning that went into revising
this brochure for the use of the public.
The Task Force, in its work with communities most affected by deteriorating lead
paint due to old housing stock and lack of resources to address the problem,
recognizes that information to the most at-risk public must be geared toward
renters as well as homeowners and must be simply stated and concretely
helpful. In the view of the Task Force the brochure needs improvement in these
two areas.
The brochure should announce at the outset that the information is intended for
renters as well as for homeowners. If the EPA includes the requirements that have
been proposed for lead safe work practices, including banned practices, as has
been urged by several commentators, the brochure should tell renters and
homeowners that the contractor who will be performing the work on their dwelling
is required by law to provide them with the brochure and to observe work practices
that do not create lead dust that could poison them and/or their children.
Further, in the interest of shortening the brochure, increasing the chance that it
will be read, a series of pictures, depicting specific unsafe work practices if finally
decided upon for inclusion in the rule, should be substituted for lengthy verbal
descriptions, with perhaps an X through those practices. A check-off box could
be provided beside each picture, asking the tenant or homeowner to check
whether he or she had received assurances from the contractor that those work
methods would not be used. Finally, we suggest a place for the
tenant/homeowner and the contractor to sign indicating that the work practices
have been discussed. This check list would also serve as a convenient way for the
tenant/homeowner to monitor whether the disallowed practices were in fact used.
The section ?Who Should Read This Pamphlet? could be eliminated. Basic facts
about lead can be presented briefly in bullet points. The rest of the bullets in this
section either assume that the contractor has not been hired yet, (and if so, how
does he present the brochure?) or are provided elsewhere, i.e., ?Where to Get
Information About Lead.?
The section ?Where Does Lead Come From? will be confusing to the person
receiving the brochure. It suggests that the work and clean up will be done by the
tenant or homeowner. The point of the brochure is to alert them to the
responsibilities of the contractor, not their own responsibilities to do lead safe
work. Where the brochure asks, ?Who is Responsible?? and answers ?You Are?,
the point is again confused. The contractor must work safely and the tenant or
homeowner should be helped by this brochure to know if that is occurring.
Finally, we suggest that the proposed language about contractors? lead safe
methods imply that these methods are optional. The public needs to be clear that
whatever requirements are finally adopted by the rule are not optional.. The last
part of the brochure is a ?how to? for contractors, but it suggests that the
tenant/homeowner must do the clean up. It also states that when the cleaning is
done no dust or debris should be visible.This is an inaccurate and harmful
statement. What is not in dispute in all the studies and stated in the EPA?s own
literature is that lead dust is often invisible and the fact that it cannot be detected
by the naked eye is no assurance that it is not present.
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on and offer suggestions for the
brochure. It is an important tool in our collective efforts to eliminate childhood lead
poisoning. The Illinois Lead Safe Housing Task Force looks forward to a final
version that will build effectively on this fine beginning.
Respectfully submitted,
Anita Weinberg, Chair
Illinois Lead Safe Housing Task Force
Comment submitted by Anita Weinberg, Chair, Illinois Leah Safe Housing Task Force
This is comment on Proposed Rule
Lead Hazard Information Pamphlet; Notice of Availability
View Comment
Related Comments
View AllPublic Submission Posted: 03/29/2006 ID: EPA-HQ-OPPT-2004-0126-0005
Apr 07,2006 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 04/10/2006 ID: EPA-HQ-OPPT-2004-0126-0008
Apr 07,2006 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 04/10/2006 ID: EPA-HQ-OPPT-2004-0126-0009
Apr 07,2006 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 04/10/2006 ID: EPA-HQ-OPPT-2004-0126-0012
Apr 07,2006 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 04/10/2006 ID: EPA-HQ-OPPT-2004-0126-0013
Apr 07,2006 11:59 PM ET