Anonymous public comment

Document ID: EPA-HQ-OPPT-2005-0049-0283
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Environmental Protection Agency
Received Date: January 23 2006, at 09:02 AM Eastern Standard Time
Date Posted: January 24 2006, at 09:02 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: January 10 2006, at 09:02 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: May 25 2006, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 8011a505
View Document:  View as format xml

This is comment on Proposed Rule

Lead; Renovation, Repair, and Painting Program

View Comment

There should be exceptions from the regulations when dealing with "certified" historic properties (locally-designated or National Register-listed individual properties and buildings within districts). It is already expensive enough to rehabilitate a historic home. By adding more regs and certifications of contractors, I foresee additional costs to owners, making rehab more cost-prohibitive and leading to a decrease in rehabilitation of historic buildings in already depressed communities.

Related Comments

    View All
Total: 231
Comment submitted by B. Sachau
Public Submission    Posted: 01/11/2006     ID: EPA-HQ-OPPT-2005-0049-0276

May 25,2006 11:59 PM ET
Comment submitted by Paul Trautman, Housing Program Administrator, City of Spokane Community Development Department
Public Submission    Posted: 01/11/2006     ID: EPA-HQ-OPPT-2005-0049-0277

May 25,2006 11:59 PM ET
Comment submitted by Robert D. Roe, Health Officer, Maplewood Health Department
Public Submission    Posted: 01/20/2006     ID: EPA-HQ-OPPT-2005-0049-0280

May 25,2006 11:59 PM ET
Comment submitted by David Stanley, Central Delaware Training Academy, Inc.
Public Submission    Posted: 01/20/2006     ID: EPA-HQ-OPPT-2005-0049-0281

May 25,2006 11:59 PM ET
Anonymous public comment
Public Submission    Posted: 01/24/2006     ID: EPA-HQ-OPPT-2005-0049-0283

May 25,2006 11:59 PM ET