The opinion below is submitted upon the EPA request to comment on whether the
rule should allow the use of vacuums other than those equipped with HEPA filters.
HEPA FILTERS. It is important to realize that the filter selection itself does not
assure the desirable level of cleaning. The vacuum cleaner?s performance
depends on the filter efficiency and the vacuum unit configuration/design
characteristics. Our published studies showed that the pick-up efficiency and the
filter by-pass effect may affect the overall capture efficiency as much as the
efficiency of the filter. Furthermore, the overall efficiency of a vacuum cleaner (as
well as the filter) is particle size dependent, and the supermicrometer leaded
particles (carrying major weight) are, as a rule, collected more efficient than those
of about 0.3-1 micron. Generally, I believe that it is appropriate to expand the
required vacuum cleaners from ?HEPA vacuums only? to ?HEPA vacuums or other
devices of equivalent efficacy? as articulated by the US Department of HUD.
CLEARANCE AFTER HAZARD REDUCTION ACTIVITIES. In my opinion, the
clearance requirement should be included as a part of the Lead Renovation, Repair
and Painting Program, with no exceptions.
Comment submitted by S. A. Grinshpun
This is comment on Proposed Rule
Lead; Renovation, Repair, and Painting Program; Extension of Comment Period
View Comment
Related Comments
View AllPublic Submission Posted: 04/25/2006 ID: EPA-HQ-OPPT-2005-0049-0439
May 25,2006 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 05/24/2006 ID: EPA-HQ-OPPT-2005-0049-0483
May 25,2006 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 05/24/2006 ID: EPA-HQ-OPPT-2005-0049-0484
May 25,2006 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 05/24/2006 ID: EPA-HQ-OPPT-2005-0049-0486
May 25,2006 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 05/24/2006 ID: EPA-HQ-OPPT-2005-0049-0487
May 25,2006 11:59 PM ET