Comment submitted by Colleen Beck, Saint Louis County Department of Health

Document ID: EPA-HQ-OPPT-2005-0049-0620
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Environmental Protection Agency
Received Date: March 30 2007, at 10:27 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Date Posted: April 2 2007, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: March 16 2007, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: April 16 2007, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 8021cc77
View Document:  View as format xml

View Comment

A protective renovation, remodeling and painting rule is an important way to prevent lead poisoning. The only possible conclusion that can be drawn from the new research is that the final rule must ban all dangerous methods of paint disturbance, require post-work clearance testing, require proper training for all workers, and ensure adequate enforcement. It is imperative that these 4 pieces be included in the rule. The proposal as it stands, gives contractors too many loopholes and permits unsafe work practices such as sanding and blasting, open flame burning and torching. These extremely dangerous methods of removing paint create and disperse lead- based paint hazards. The study conducted by EPA demonstrates that these practices, which are considered unsafe by HUD, really are unsafe and should be prohibited. However, using lead safe work practices is not by itself protective enough. Only clearance testing can verify that in fact no lead-based paint hazards exist. EPA's proposed cleaning verification does not verify the absence of lead dust. In the EPA study, cleaning verification was not always accurate in identifying the presence of lead levels above the EPA standard. All renovation and remodeling workers as well as painters have the right to be properly trained in lead safe work practices. Proper training is beneficial to the worker, the employeer, the home owner and his/her family as well as the family of the worker. I strongly urge EPA to include the 4 pieces listed above in the proposed renovation, remodeling and painting rule.

Related Comments

    View All
Total: 95
Comment submitted by W. L. Townsend
Public Submission    Posted: 03/23/2007     ID: EPA-HQ-OPPT-2005-0049-0618

Apr 16,2007 11:59 PM ET
Comment subitted by R. Rabin
Public Submission    Posted: 03/27/2007     ID: EPA-HQ-OPPT-2005-0049-0619

Apr 16,2007 11:59 PM ET
Comment submitted by Colleen Beck, Saint Louis County Department of Health
Public Submission    Posted: 04/02/2007     ID: EPA-HQ-OPPT-2005-0049-0620

Apr 16,2007 11:59 PM ET
Comment submitted by Laura Abulafia, American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities
Public Submission    Posted: 04/02/2007     ID: EPA-HQ-OPPT-2005-0049-0621

Apr 16,2007 11:59 PM ET
Comment submitted by Mary Busey Harris, Executive Vice President, National Association of the Remodeling Industry (NARI)
Public Submission    Posted: 04/10/2007     ID: EPA-HQ-OPPT-2005-0049-0622

Apr 16,2007 11:59 PM ET