Comment submitted by B. Sachau

Document ID: EPA-HQ-OPPT-2006-0795-0013
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Environmental Protection Agency
Received Date: December 18 2006, at 09:43 AM Eastern Standard Time
Date Posted: December 20 2006, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: December 18 2006, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: January 17 2007, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 801ed71b
View Document:

This is comment on Proposed Rule

2,3,5,6-Tetrachloro-2,5-Cyclohexadiene-1,4-Dione; Proposed Significant New Use of a Chemical Substance; Reopening of Comment Period

View Comment

publi comment on federal register of 12/18/06 vol 71 #242 pg 75703 40 cfr part 721 docket 2006-0795 frl 8102-3 rin 2070-aj3l 2,3,5,6 tetrachloro... i think this new use should be totally banned. i see no reason to allow the new use of this dangerous chemical. that is my opinion. america simply does not need any more dangerous chemicals, we already have tens of thousands in full use and this agency is far too much in bed with chemical profiteers. and not fully protecting american citizens. b. sachau 15 elm st florham park nj 07932

Related Comments

Total: 2

Comment submitted by J. Lawrence Robinson, President, Color Pigments Manufacturers Association, Inc. (CPMA)
Public Submission Posted: 01/25/2007 ID: EPA-HQ-OPPT-2006-0795-0014

Comment Period Closed
Jan 17,2007 11:59 PM ET

Comment submitted by B. Sachau
Public Submission Posted: 12/20/2006 ID: EPA-HQ-OPPT-2006-0795-0013

Comment Period Closed
Jan 17,2007 11:59 PM ET