Anonymous public comment

Document ID: EPA-HQ-OPPT-2010-0173-0044
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Environmental Protection Agency
Received Date: May 17 2010, at 12:00 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Date Posted: May 18 2010, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: May 6 2010, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: July 6 2010, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 80aeeff3
View Document:

This is comment on Proposed Rule

Renovation, Repair, and Painting Program for Public and Commercial Buildings:

View Comment

I am opposed to this law, as it appears demolition is not covered, but deconstruction is, thereby increasing the cost of deconstruction and making it even more expensive than demolition. How can you expect us to do the right thing and help the environment and those who live off of it (animals, people) if you make the cost to do so prohibitive? Thanks for listening.

Related Comments

View All

Total: 46

Comment submitted by Martinez (no first name provided)
Public Submission Posted: 05/12/2010 ID: EPA-HQ-OPPT-2010-0173-0043