"I am opposed to the approval of 2, 4D. This plan has alarmed environmentalists and also many farmers, who are reluctant to reintroduce a chemical whose toxicity has been well established. The use of 2, 4-D is banned in several European countries and provinces of Canada. The substance is a suspected carcinogen which has been shown to double the incidence of birth defects in the children of pesticide applicators in a study conducted by University of Minnesota pathologist Vincent Garry.
Researchers say that the effect of 2,4-D on human health is still not fully understood. But it may be a risk factor for conditions like non-Hodgkins lymphoma, which was often found in Vietnam veterans exposed to Agent Orange. The EPA has stated that the chemical has "endocrine disruption potential" and interferes with the human hormonal system. It has also been shown to be toxic to honeybees, birds and fish according to research conducted by the US Forest Service and others.
It is here: http://www.epa.gov/oppsrrd1/REDs/factsheets/24d_fs.htm "
Anonymous public comment
This is comment on Proposed Rule
Significant New Use Rules on Certain Chemical Substances
View Comment
Related Comments
Public Submission Posted: 02/01/2012 ID: EPA-HQ-OPPT-2010-1075-0074
Feb 26,2012 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 02/27/2012 ID: EPA-HQ-OPPT-2010-1075-0076
Feb 26,2012 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 02/28/2012 ID: EPA-HQ-OPPT-2010-1075-0077
Feb 26,2012 11:59 PM ET