Comment submitted by B. Pinti

Document ID: EPA-HQ-ORD-2012-0358-0005
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Environmental Protection Agency
Received Date: June 11 2012, at 12:00 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Date Posted: June 13 2012, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: June 5 2012, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: June 26 2012, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 81040ea6
View Document:  View as format xml

View Comment

Just wanted to comment as a citizen on Bristol Bay. It appears that the panel of advisors are professional in their field for evaluating mining in Bristol Bay. However, Bristol Bay should be a no brainer when it comes to protecting, the salmon runs, the native indians, the mountains, rivers & wildlife there all need protection & the minerals for profit should not compromise any of these things! Certain areas need & deserve protection, Bristol Bay has not yet been abused by industry, industry must find their natural resources in less sensitive areas & proceed with the utmost caution in regards to operating in a environmental pleasing manner. But not Bristol Bay! Bristol Bay? No Way!

Related Comments

    View All
Total: 21
Comment submitted by H. Schmitz
Public Submission    Posted: 06/08/2012     ID: EPA-HQ-ORD-2012-0358-0002

Jun 26,2012 11:59 PM ET
Comment submitted by M. Hauck
Public Submission    Posted: 06/12/2012     ID: EPA-HQ-ORD-2012-0358-0004

Jun 26,2012 11:59 PM ET
Comment submitted by B. Pinti
Public Submission    Posted: 06/13/2012     ID: EPA-HQ-ORD-2012-0358-0005

Jun 26,2012 11:59 PM ET
Comment submitted by J. Public
Public Submission    Posted: 06/13/2012     ID: EPA-HQ-ORD-2012-0358-0006

Jun 26,2012 11:59 PM ET
Comment submitted by J. M. Strobel
Public Submission    Posted: 06/14/2012     ID: EPA-HQ-ORD-2012-0358-0007

Jun 26,2012 11:59 PM ET