Anonymous public comment

Document ID: EPA-HQ-OW-2002-0068-0232
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Environmental Protection Agency
Received Date: January 10 2006, at 11:39 AM Eastern Standard Time
Date Posted: 
Comment Start Date: 
Comment Due Date: February 21 2006, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 8010cf85
View Document:  View as format xml

View Comment

NPDES permits were originally instituted to protect the nation?s water supply. The permits protect our water from unnecessary pollution generated from various activities. Therefore, I do not believe that the Oil and Gas Construction should be exempt from the NPDES permits. Oil and Gas Construction sites will pollute even more than building a house or fixing a road. I know that regulation limits the sites to 1-5 acres, but the same is still acceptable to building other structures such as houses, businesses, roads, power lines, etc. Most business, homes and power line towers do not consume more than 5 acres. If you implement this rule, the burden of cost will be shifted from the Oil and Gas companies to the communities housing the construction sites. And that does not make sense. Theoretically, companies that build houses shift the NPDES burden to the customer buying the house. And it should be the same way for the Oil and Gas companies. Shift the burden to all the people consuming oil and gas. Do not leave the burden up to the communities with oil and gas. If people complain about the cost of gas and oil, then they will find other renewable resources, and they will vote the law makers that made the 2005 Energy Regulation out of office.

Related Comments

    View All
Total: 56
Comment submitted by B. Sachau
Public Submission    Posted: 01/09/2006     ID: EPA-HQ-OW-2002-0068-0231

Feb 21,2006 11:59 PM ET
Anonymous public comment
Public Submission    Posted:     ID: EPA-HQ-OW-2002-0068-0232

Feb 21,2006 11:59 PM ET
Comment submitted by D. Marcin
Public Submission    Posted: 01/12/2006     ID: EPA-HQ-OW-2002-0068-0233

Feb 21,2006 11:59 PM ET
Comment submitted by S. B. Strout
Public Submission    Posted: 02/06/2006     ID: EPA-HQ-OW-2002-0068-0237

Feb 21,2006 11:59 PM ET
Comment submitted by D. Stewart
Public Submission    Posted: 02/06/2006     ID: EPA-HQ-OW-2002-0068-0238

Feb 21,2006 11:59 PM ET