The following comments are made to the Environmental Protection Agency
relating to Water Docket ID No. OW-2005-0037.
The goals of clean drinking water and healthy streams, lakes and estuaries are
honored as highly by those in the animal agriculture industry as other segments of
our society and this industry will be on board with reasonable regulations as whole
heartedly as any other industry in our country. In the main it appears that the
Agency has made good efforts to address the mandates of the Court relating to
the CAFO regulations and as one familiar with the animal agriculture industry I
found points of agreement easily. However, the following comments are given for
consideration by the Agency in the revision of these regulations.
EPA should drop consideration of requiring large CAFOs to comply with the
elements of 40 CFR 412.4(c) in order to obtain the agricultural storm water
exemption because:
? This goes beyond the court-endorsed agricultural storm water
exemption contained in 40 CFR 122.23(e).
? In some ways, it defeats the purpose of ensuring agronomically and
environmentally sound utilization of litter and manure in crop or forage production
as dictated by a site specific nutrient management plan for the production unit.
? It may make it more convenient for producers to market litter or manure
generated and purchase unregulated commercial fertilizer that is more likely to
leach into the surface or ground water than an equivalent amount of the same
nutrients in the form of litter or manure.
Nutrient Management Plans are commonly looked upon as confidential
documents and we believe that inclusion of these as a part of the NPDES permits
will also encourage many producers to opt for selling their manure or litter rather
than using it themselves. Effort should be made to develop a means to keep
these plans as confidential documents. Certain documents can be classified as
confidential in other industrial permitting processes and this option should also be
extended to this permitting process also.
Thanks for the opportunity to comment on these important regulations.
Sincerely,
Doelas Landes
Director Environmental Services
O. K. Industries, Inc.
Fort Smith, Arkansas
Comment submitted by Doelas Landes, Director, Environmental Services, O. K. Industries, Inc.
This is comment on Proposed Rule
Extension of Public Comment Period for the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit Regulation and Effluent Limitation Guidelines for Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations in Response to Waterkeeper Decision Proposed Rule
View Comment
Related Comments
View AllPublic Submission Posted: 08/14/2006 ID: EPA-HQ-OW-2005-0037-0325
Aug 29,2006 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 08/16/2006 ID: EPA-HQ-OW-2005-0037-0485
Aug 29,2006 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 08/16/2006 ID: EPA-HQ-OW-2005-0037-0486
Aug 29,2006 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 08/21/2006 ID: EPA-HQ-OW-2005-0037-0539
Aug 29,2006 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 08/28/2006 ID: EPA-HQ-OW-2005-0037-0555
Aug 29,2006 11:59 PM ET