Anonymous public comment

Document ID: EPA-HQ-OW-2006-0141-0008
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Environmental Protection Agency
Received Date: June 09 2006, at 09:57 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Date Posted: June 12 2006, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: June 7 2006, at 08:26 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: July 24 2006, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 80184f3f
View Document:  View as format xml

View Comment

The proposed rule, to eliminate federal oversight of all water transfers, seems highly inappropriate. Although most transfers fall in the category of infrastructure development and do not constitute a direct pollutant discharge, there are some that should be considered discharge of a pollutant. It is important to keep NPDES authority in place to prevent any transfers that would result in a violation of water quality standards of the receiving waters.

Related Comments

    View All
Total: 1,381
Comment submitted by A. Slap
Public Submission    Posted: 06/09/2006     ID: EPA-HQ-OW-2006-0141-0006

Jul 24,2006 11:59 PM ET
Comment submitted by M. Valiquette
Public Submission    Posted: 06/09/2006     ID: EPA-HQ-OW-2006-0141-0007

Jul 24,2006 11:59 PM ET
Anonymous public comment
Public Submission    Posted: 06/12/2006     ID: EPA-HQ-OW-2006-0141-0008

Jul 24,2006 11:59 PM ET
Comment submitted by Ron Suttles, Oklahoma Department of Wildlife Conservation
Public Submission    Posted: 06/12/2006     ID: EPA-HQ-OW-2006-0141-0009

Jul 24,2006 11:59 PM ET
Anonymous public comment
Public Submission    Posted: 06/12/2006     ID: EPA-HQ-OW-2006-0141-0010

Jul 24,2006 11:59 PM ET