Dear Sir or Madam,
I am the owner of a 33-foot sailboat and I obey all the laws against the discharge of
pollutants. However, this sailboat is not my full-time job, it is my very part-time hobby.
And for every hour that I sail, I usually need to spend an hour or two maintaining the
boat. So I find the suggestion that I, and millions of people like me, should have to deal
directly with the EPA's permit process extremely objectionable, for at least two reasons:
1 - The amount of time and distress that the process would cost me. No offence, but
based on my experience, it is it the nature of the government regulation process to be
excessively complex and legalistic which puts us mere mortals at an extreme
disadvantage. I'm not thrilled with the idea of being fined or going to jail because I didn't
engage a lawyer to fill out my permit application.
2 - As a citizen, I am appalled at the magnitude of this program and what it will cost in
terms of tax money and bureaucratic effort to implement.
For these reasons, I urge you to categorically exclude small recreational vessels from
the entire permit process. Thank you.
Anonymous public comment
This is comment on Notice
Draft National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Permits for Discharges Incidental to the Normal Operation of a Vessel
View Comment
Related Comments
View AllPublic Submission Posted: 06/17/2008 ID: EPA-HQ-OW-2008-0055-0256
Aug 01,2008 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 06/19/2008 ID: EPA-HQ-OW-2008-0055-0258
Aug 01,2008 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 06/24/2008 ID: EPA-HQ-OW-2008-0055-0259
Aug 01,2008 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 07/02/2008 ID: EPA-HQ-OW-2008-0055-0260
Aug 01,2008 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 07/08/2008 ID: EPA-HQ-OW-2008-0055-0261
Aug 01,2008 11:59 PM ET