Comment submitted by P. Redlich

Document ID: EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0596-0484
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Environmental Protection Agency
Received Date: February 05 2010, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Date Posted: February 12 2010, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: January 26 2010, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: April 28 2010, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 80a8eb85
View Document:  View as format xml

View Comment

My husband and I have been concerned for sometime regarding the regulations that are being proposed by the EPA. I know there are some serious challenges ahead but the impacts from such a proposal would devastate the people it affects and far outweigh any environmental benefit. This, like everything else the government sticks it's nose into, is rushing into rules that will create regulations that aren't scientifically based and the cost in operating and cleanup is cost prohibited. At this time, you don't even know if it will produce healthier, ecologically sound surface waters! I really wonder whose interest you are really looking out for...or should I say....whose pockets are you trying to fill? I no longer trust anything the government says is "good for us!" We certainly know how scientific "global warming" has turned out to be. We support a solution allowing DEP to continue research, through a transparent public process, based on scientific facts that will consider the natural variability and unique qualities of Florida waters. I'm third generation native to Florida and I want the waters clean, I just don't trust what you are doing and they way you are proceeding. Citizens have had enough...we are going to be observant of everything in this state that is going on and question every motive. Please feel free to contact us if you would like to further discuss this. Thank you Patty Redlich

Related Comments

    View All
Total: 1,217
Comment submitted by K. Reinhold
Public Submission    Posted: 01/29/2010     ID: EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0596-0182

Apr 28,2010 11:59 PM ET
Comment submitted by P. Redlich
Public Submission    Posted: 02/12/2010     ID: EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0596-0484

Apr 28,2010 11:59 PM ET
Comment submitted by M. Shacter
Public Submission    Posted: 02/12/2010     ID: EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0596-0485

Apr 28,2010 11:59 PM ET
Anonymous public comment
Public Submission    Posted: 02/12/2010     ID: EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0596-0486

Apr 28,2010 11:59 PM ET
Comment submitted by M. Judd
Public Submission    Posted: 02/16/2010     ID: EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0596-0502

Apr 28,2010 11:59 PM ET