Comment submitted by James Schmidt, Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WIDNR)

Document ID: EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0921-0006
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Environmental Protection Agency
Received Date: January 22 2010, at 10:25 AM Eastern Standard Time
Date Posted: January 25 2010, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: December 30 2009, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: April 1 2010, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 80a812a9
View Document:  View as format xml

View Comment

I've got two comments on the proposed criteria, one is fairly simple and the other is a bit more complicated. 1) I think there's a typographical error in the tabe on page 43, namely the acute criteria for mussels absent at temperature 18C. Earlier on page 35, the document states the criteria for mussels absent increases with decreasing temperature until it reaches a maximum at 16.6C. However, in the table on page 43, the criteria are the same at 16C and 18C; if the criteria increase until 16.6C then the results at 18C should be different than (and more stringent than) those at 16C. The difference isn't great (I checked some examples), but it's still a diffeence that should be corrected. I didn't check the other temperatures, but this is just one that jumped out because there should have been a difference. Second, and more significant, I question the document retaining the assumed relationships between pH and temperature and ammonia toxicity from the equations in the 1999 document. I realize the impact on the equations isn't great, but given that there are over twice as many acute toxicity study results in the new draft than there were in 1999, I find it hard to believe that there's no change in the assumed relationship. Given the impact these criteria have on wastewater discharges, I feel it's responsible of you to have all the statistical considerations current. The 1999 document had 37 results from invertebrate tests and 255 for fish, this draft has 148 results for invertebrates and 479 for fish and amphibians and given that many of those species have three or more results, it's almost certain that the pH and temperature relationships would change. I didn't check what the changes are, but Wisconsin used similar logic to adjust the hardness/toxicity relationships for metals in recent criteria changes and we would expect the same would be done here especially given the larger database size. - James Schmidt WI DNR 6082677658 jamesw.schmidt@wisconsin.gov

Related Comments

    View All
Total: 51
Comment submitted by James Schmidt, Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WIDNR)
Public Submission    Posted: 01/25/2010     ID: EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0921-0006

Apr 01,2010 11:59 PM ET
Comment submitted by Barbara J. Biggs, Governmental Affairs Officer, Metro Wastewater Reclamation District (Metro District)
Public Submission    Posted: 02/24/2010     ID: EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0921-0008

Apr 01,2010 11:59 PM ET
Comment submitted by Nick Menninga, President, Illinois Association of Wastewater Agencies (IAWA)
Public Submission    Posted: 02/24/2010     ID: EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0921-0009

Apr 01,2010 11:59 PM ET
Comment submitted by Josh Avey, Habitat Branch Chief, The Arizona Game and Fish Department
Public Submission    Posted: 02/26/2010     ID: EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0921-0013

Apr 01,2010 11:59 PM ET
Comment submitted by Sarah Mitchell, Regulatory Affairs Director, The City of Elkhart Public Works and Utilities
Public Submission    Posted: 03/02/2010     ID: EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0921-0014

Apr 01,2010 11:59 PM ET