I am writing to support the regulation of coal ash as a non-hazardous waste under subtitle D of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). I agree with the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) previous regulatory findings that non-hazardous regulation of coal ash will fully protect human health and the environment. Hazardous waste regulation is unnecessary, and would cripple the ability to beneficially use and recycle these materials. Thus, hazardous waste rules under RCRA subtitle C are not only unnecessary, but would be environmentally counter-productive. Finally, hazardous waste rules would significantly harm the economy by eliminating jobs and raising the cost of electricity for millions of American households and businesses.
Enforcement of existing regulation would be more than adequate to safegaurd human health in my opinion. Please place common sense over politics.
Sincerely,
Denis M. Osowski
3244 Camden Rue
Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio 44223
dmosowski@hotmail.com
Comment submitted by D. Osowski
This is comment on Proposed Rule
Coal Combustion Residual Surface Impoundments; Data Availability
View Comment
Related Comments
View AllPublic Submission Posted: 11/22/2011 ID: EPA-HQ-RCRA-2009-0640-11851
Nov 19,2010 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 12/08/2011 ID: EPA-HQ-RCRA-2009-0640-11852
Nov 19,2010 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 12/08/2011 ID: EPA-HQ-RCRA-2009-0640-11853
Nov 19,2010 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 12/08/2011 ID: EPA-HQ-RCRA-2009-0640-11854
Nov 19,2010 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 11/04/2010 ID: EPA-HQ-RCRA-2009-0640-5671
Nov 19,2010 11:59 PM ET