Public comment submitted by J. Saunders

Document ID: EPA-HQ-SFUND-2005-0007-0007
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Environmental Protection Agency
Received Date: June 06 2012, at 12:00 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Date Posted: June 7 2012, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: May 25 2012, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: July 24 2012, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 81038cf6
View Document:  View as format xml

View Comment

I attended June 4th public hearing regarding EPA's water shed assessment report. The science is very important. I took note of testimony about lakes transfering water top to bottom twice a year, the sponge wet nature of the subject area, the size of the subject mine, words of the residents of how fish fry swim, along with bird's habitats, to the ocean through the marshy area and EPA's comments of into perpetuity for after mine operations. Please make sure about these issues if a permit is awarded. Maybe require the mine to line the area to prevent leaching or try and make it so bullet proof they might just say we have to wait.

Related Comments

    View All
Total: 6
Public comment submitted by J. Saunders
Public Submission    Posted: 06/07/2012     ID: EPA-HQ-SFUND-2005-0007-0007

Jul 24,2012 11:59 PM ET
Comment submitted by W. R. Henkle, Jr.
Public Submission    Posted: 07/23/2012     ID: EPA-HQ-SFUND-2005-0007-0009

Jul 24,2012 11:59 PM ET
Anonymous public comment
Public Submission    Posted: 07/24/2012     ID: EPA-HQ-SFUND-2005-0007-0011

Jul 24,2012 11:59 PM ET
Comment submitted by J. Davis
Public Submission    Posted: 07/23/2012     ID: EPA-HQ-SFUND-2005-0007-0008

Jul 24,2012 11:59 PM ET
Comment submitted by R. Lehn
Public Submission    Posted: 07/24/2012     ID: EPA-HQ-SFUND-2005-0007-0010

Jul 24,2012 11:59 PM ET