brian sharp <ecoperspectives@yahoo.com>
03/08/2007 08:08 PM To
nevermined@earthlink.net
cc
petersleeth@news.oregonian.com, Docket Superfund@EPA
bcc
Subject
Formosa mine, Silver Butte, Oregon
Dear EPA,
I am writing to provide comments on the Formosa mine
at Silver Butte, Oregon, for the public record.
For the past 2-3 years, I have been doing independent
research on the occurrence of the California Condor in
the Pacific Northwest.
I wish to bring to your attention the little-known
fact that California Condors were observed at Silver
Butte by Bill Brown, Forest Service lookout, in the
period 1930-35.
This is one of a series of observations spanning more
than a century in that area. These included the
observations of: Donald McLeod, Hudson's Bay Company,
in 1826; Titian Peale, ornithologist attached to the
Ex.Ex under the command of Chas. Wilkes, in 1841;
Roselle Putnam, one of the first settlers in the upper
Umpqua, and daughter of Jesse Applegate, in 1852;
George and Henry Peck of Drain in 1903 and 1904; and
the above-mentioned Bill Brown. The span of records
was thus 1826 to 1935, 110 years.
This is the longest series of records of condors in
the Northwest. Condors frequented this area for
generations, and was one of the most important areas
in Oregon for condors.
I was therefore shocked and dismayed to read in The
Oregonian on March 8 2007 of the contamination of
creeks in the Umpqua watershed in the Silver Butte
area by water runoff pollution from the Formosa mine.
The diet of condors in the Pacific Northwest included
salmon and steelhead. It is also dismaying that this
potential food supply has been impaired in two ways:
1) because of the simple reduction in salmonid
numbers, and 2) because of the contamination of the
watershed by heavy metal toxins from the mine. Any
condors in the area would thus 1) find less food to
support them, and 2) find food that is or might be
contaminated. Reintroduction of condors in this area
would therefore put reintroduced birds at risk for two
reasons, from a reduction in food supply and from
poisoning. Poisoning is the principal reason for the
disappearance of condors from all parts of its range,
including both California and the Northwest, in the
last 200 years.
If condors were to be at some time reintroduced to the
Northwest, the Umpqua would have been one of the key
sites I would have recommended for consideration. The
pollution of the Umpqua watershed makes reintroduction
to this part of Oregon much less attractive, the
Umpqua much less a potential site than it could have
been, and even a reason not to risk or bother at all.
The information provided above is derived from my
research, in a paper titled "The Extent to which
California Condors were Overlooked in Northwestern
North America", which has been submitted for
publication.
Sincerely,
Brian E. Sharp, Avian Ecologist
Ecological Perspectives
2625 NE Clackamas St
Portland, Oregon 97232
503-288-3605.
cc. Larry Tuttle, Center for Environmental Equity
Peter Sleeth, The Oregonian
___________________________________________________________________________
_________
Looking for earth-friendly autos?
Browse Top Cars by "Green Rating" at Yahoo! Autos' Green Center.
http://autos.yahoo.com/green_center/
Comment submitted by B. E. Sharp
This is comment on Proposed Rule
National Priorities List, Proposed Rule No. 46
View Comment
Related Comments
View AllPublic Submission Posted: 03/14/2007 ID: EPA-HQ-SFUND-2007-0079-0004
May 07,2007 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 03/14/2007 ID: EPA-HQ-SFUND-2007-0079-0005
May 07,2007 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 03/14/2007 ID: EPA-HQ-SFUND-2007-0079-0006
May 07,2007 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 03/22/2007 ID: EPA-HQ-SFUND-2007-0079-0008
May 07,2007 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 04/12/2007 ID: EPA-HQ-SFUND-2007-0079-0009
May 07,2007 11:59 PM ET