Tim Shaw <tim@shawmortgage.net>
03/20/2007 03:31 PM To
Docket Superfund@EPA
cc
apearson@newsreview.info
bcc
Subject
EPA-HQ-SFUND-2007-00079
I saw in a recent newspaper article (The News-Review, March 7, 2007) there
was an article regarding the Formosa Mine. I do not feel that any money
needs to be spent on this site. From the article I see that the Oregon
Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) is now trying to drag in the
EPA. This site should be just left alone. The problems with that area
stem back a lot further than when Formosa was active. Formosa may have
aggravated the situation but it was a preexisting condition.
I am an Oregon State University graduate in Geology and was the former
Exploration Geologist at the Formosa (Silver Peak) Mine. If we do a quick
geological review of this area you will find that there are a number of
peaks running southwest / northeast. A number of these peaks contain or
contained mineralization. Dr. Lu, Ph.D. theorized that these peaks were
once part of a spreading center or mineralization funnels deep under the
ocean. These areas of mineralization occurred due to mineral rich super
heated waters coming up through the earths crust. These waters also
contained a large amount of sulfur, especially Silver Peak. Some of the
mineralization was very rich in nickel (note Nickel Mountain to the
Southwest). The sulfide mineralization inside Silver Peak has been there
for a very very long time.
In the late 1800s and early 1900s prospectors combed the valleys looking
for mineralization sign and then worked their way up into the mountains to
find the source. Silver Peak was typical of this prospecting. When they
thought they were near the source they started tunneling into the mountain
with picks, shovels, iron bars, and explosives. The area surrounding
Silver Peak is pock marked with adits. Many of them, that I visited, had
water backed up into them or flowing out of them. I visited Nickel
Mountain and the main adit at Silver Peak prior to my employment at
Formosa as part of my OSU geology study. At that time water was flowing
out of the adit. That water was very acidic. It was acidic simply
because ground water was flowing through the naturally fractured and
jointed rock. Rock that was high in sulfide ores. This action creates
sulfuric acid.
Here is the bottom line, unless you are going to remove the entire
mountain and clean up EVERY adit in that area it will rain, the rain will
penetrate the ground, it will peculate through the ground and dissolve the
minerals in the ground, and eventually flow out in the valley where
everyone can get excited about how nasty those miners were. So I just do
not see the point in trying to fix something God put there eons ago. Can
t we spend our money more wisely?
My contact information is below. I would be happy to chat with you
further regarding the history and geology of the area.
Tim Shaw
Shaw Mortgage
P - 907-563-0269
F - 907-522-5506
C - 907-250-0275
866-TIM-SHAW
tim@shawmortgage.net
www.shawmortgage.net
Comment submitted by T. Shaw
This is comment on Proposed Rule
National Priorities List, Proposed Rule No. 46
View Comment
Related Comments
View AllPublic Submission Posted: 03/14/2007 ID: EPA-HQ-SFUND-2007-0079-0004
May 07,2007 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 03/14/2007 ID: EPA-HQ-SFUND-2007-0079-0005
May 07,2007 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 03/14/2007 ID: EPA-HQ-SFUND-2007-0079-0006
May 07,2007 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 03/22/2007 ID: EPA-HQ-SFUND-2007-0079-0008
May 07,2007 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 04/12/2007 ID: EPA-HQ-SFUND-2007-0079-0009
May 07,2007 11:59 PM ET