Comment submitted by J. Hicks

Document ID: EPA-HQ-SFUND-2009-0063-0009
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Environmental Protection Agency
Received Date: April 15 2009, at 03:37 PM Eastern Daylight Time
Date Posted: April 16 2009, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: April 9 2009, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: July 8 2009, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 80954c6d
View Document:  View as format xml

This is comment on Proposed Rule

National Priorities List; Proposed Rule No. 50

View Comment

I support listing the Gowanus Canal as a Superfund site. The canal has great potential to be an asset to the community, but it needs to be clean and safe. The canal has been polluted and abused for so long, it has long deserved being labelled a "priority" for clean-up.

Related Comments

    View All
Total: 718
Comment submitted by M. Flaherty
Public Submission    Posted: 04/16/2009     ID: EPA-HQ-SFUND-2009-0063-0006

Jul 08,2009 11:59 PM ET
Comment submitted by S. Clausen
Public Submission    Posted: 04/16/2009     ID: EPA-HQ-SFUND-2009-0063-0008

Jul 08,2009 11:59 PM ET
Comment submitted by J. Hicks
Public Submission    Posted: 04/16/2009     ID: EPA-HQ-SFUND-2009-0063-0009

Jul 08,2009 11:59 PM ET
Anonymous public comment
Public Submission    Posted: 04/16/2009     ID: EPA-HQ-SFUND-2009-0063-0010

Jul 08,2009 11:59 PM ET
Comment submitted by J. Hatheway
Public Submission    Posted: 04/20/2009     ID: EPA-HQ-SFUND-2009-0063-0011

Jul 08,2009 11:59 PM ET