Anonymous public comment

Document ID: EPA-HQ-SFUND-2009-0063-0010
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Environmental Protection Agency
Received Date: April 15 2009, at 03:01 PM Eastern Daylight Time
Date Posted: April 16 2009, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: April 9 2009, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: July 8 2009, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 80954b70
View Document:  View as format xml

This is comment on Proposed Rule

National Priorities List; Proposed Rule No. 50

View Comment

To whom it may concern: I strongly support Superfund status for the Gowanus Canal. It will provide exactly the type of stimulus this neighborhood needs! The alternative will be inefficient local development. The city's development of the Greenpoint Williamsburg Waterfront is a perfect example of how stalled out local projects can become. A unified long term plan for the Gowanus will enable cost efficient and well thought out development to occur throughout the canal for the next several decades (and centuries to follow!).

Related Comments

    View All
Total: 718
Comment submitted by M. Flaherty
Public Submission    Posted: 04/16/2009     ID: EPA-HQ-SFUND-2009-0063-0006

Jul 08,2009 11:59 PM ET
Comment submitted by S. Clausen
Public Submission    Posted: 04/16/2009     ID: EPA-HQ-SFUND-2009-0063-0008

Jul 08,2009 11:59 PM ET
Comment submitted by J. Hicks
Public Submission    Posted: 04/16/2009     ID: EPA-HQ-SFUND-2009-0063-0009

Jul 08,2009 11:59 PM ET
Anonymous public comment
Public Submission    Posted: 04/16/2009     ID: EPA-HQ-SFUND-2009-0063-0010

Jul 08,2009 11:59 PM ET
Comment submitted by J. Hatheway
Public Submission    Posted: 04/20/2009     ID: EPA-HQ-SFUND-2009-0063-0011

Jul 08,2009 11:59 PM ET