Anonymous public comment

Document ID: EPA-HQ-SFUND-2012-0647-0010
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Environmental Protection Agency
Received Date: November 19 2012, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Date Posted: November 20 2012, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: September 18 2012, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: November 19 2012, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 1jw-822q-qowr
View Document:  View as format xml

This is comment on Proposed Rule

National Priorities List: Proposed Rule No. 57

View Comment

I agree that the plume should be studied and residual contaminants cleaned up, not only for the sake of residents and humans downstream,but for all the plants and wild life that may be affected.

Related Comments

    View All
Total: 6
Comment submitted by S. Frank
Public Submission    Posted: 11/07/2012     ID: EPA-HQ-SFUND-2012-0647-0005

Nov 19,2012 11:59 PM ET
Comment submitted by Richard J. Angell, Parsons Behle & Latimer on behalf of Rowland Hall -St. Mark's School (RHSM)
Public Submission    Posted: 11/13/2012     ID: EPA-HQ-SFUND-2012-0647-0006

Nov 19,2012 11:59 PM ET
Comment submitted by D. Kitchen
Public Submission    Posted: 11/15/2012     ID: EPA-HQ-SFUND-2012-0647-0008

Nov 19,2012 11:59 PM ET
Anonymous public comment
Public Submission    Posted: 11/20/2012     ID: EPA-HQ-SFUND-2012-0647-0009

Nov 19,2012 11:59 PM ET
Anonymous public comment
Public Submission    Posted: 11/20/2012     ID: EPA-HQ-SFUND-2012-0647-0010

Nov 19,2012 11:59 PM ET