Based on the condition that the resultant sludge is a combination of three(3) independent
waste streams (i.e. it appears each waste stream is being diluted by two(2) other waste
streams) it would be prudent to require IBM to submit to EPA, or the landfill, monthly waste
rates from each of the three(3) independent waste streams to ensure the contribution ratios
are not dramatically changing.
The removal of one waste process could potentially increase the hazardous components by
50% from the other 2 waste streams. If volume of sludge waste is a component in EPA’s
calculations related to overall impact, then the increase, or reduction of a waste stream could
impact the results.
Thank you,
Attachments:
7_17_12 email commentRMcDonald
Title: 7_17_12 email commentRMcDonald
View Attachment:
Related Comments
Total: 1
7_17_12 email comment Public SubmissionPosted: 08/13/2012
ID: EPA-R01-RCRA-2012-0447-0019
7_17_12 email comment
This is comment on Proposed Rule
Hazardous Waste Management System: Identification and Listing of Hazardous Waste; Exclusions
View Comment
Attachments:
7_17_12 email commentRMcDonald
Title:
7_17_12 email commentRMcDonald
Related Comments
Public Submission Posted: 08/13/2012 ID: EPA-R01-RCRA-2012-0447-0019
Aug 15,2012 11:59 PM ET