EPA-R03-OAR-2006-0280 COMMENTS
A. The Frog, Switch & Manufacturing Company
V-Process #1, #2, and #3:
What is the basis for the VOC content limit of "10% by volume" in condition 5 of
the plan approval? In section 3.2.2 of the company's RACT proposal, the use of
water-based washes is shown as a technically feasible control option with an
estimated VOC reduction potential of 100%. There appears to be no
documentation on the basis for the "10% by volume" limit.
No-bake Mold Wash and Core Wash:
What are the results of the study required in condition 6 of the plan approval? The
purpose of the study was to establish VOC content limits. In sections 3.2.3 and
3.2.4 of the company's RACT proposal, the use of water-based washes is shown
as a technically feasible control option with an estimated VOC reduction potential
of 100%. There appears to be no VOC content limit or emissions cap for RACT.
Casting Painting:
Shouldn't this process also be subject to the VOC limits for miscellaneous metal
parts and products under 25 PA Code 129.52 (surface coating processes)? There
is no discussion on this issue in the documentation and no related conditions in
the plan approval.
B. Merck & Co.
Wastewater Treatment Plant:
Shouldn't there be overall RACT requirements pertaining to the wastewater
treatment plant regarding handling, treatment, and disposal of all process
wastewater containing VOC? In order for condition 5 of plan approval OP-49-
0007B to be enforceable, shouldn't plan approval 49-313-0321 be included in the
documentation and SIP submission? The cooling tower had accounted for
about "47% of the total VOC emissions from the system" but there is no
information on the fate of the cooling tower VOCs after replacement of the cooling
tower with heat exchangers. There are no RACT requirements pertaining to
measurement and testing for proper operation of the biological treatment process.
C. Dart Container Corporation
Operating permit 36-2015 does not address RACT for the cleaning solvents, which
are estimated to be 30 tons per year of emissions. Also, the current control of
VOC emissions from the pre-expanders should be included in the operating permit
as part of the RACT requirements. The use of a concentrator in series with an
oxidation control device for the dilute VOC gas streams from the cup production
plants should be evaluated for technical and economic feasibility. A "proven
success" for a similar plant is not a pre-condition for RACT evaluation.
Comment on FR Doc # E6-06771
This is comment on Proposed Rule
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Pennsylvania; VOC and NOX RACT Determinations for Seven Individual Sources
View Comment
Related Comments
Public Submission Posted: 06/09/2006 ID: EPA-R03-OAR-2006-0280-0010
Jun 05,2006 11:59 PM ET