Public Comment from Robert Vandenberg on FR Doc # E8-08005

Document ID: EPA-R03-OAR-2007-1120-0006
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Environmental Protection Agency
Received Date: April 15 2008, at 03:20 PM Eastern Daylight Time
Date Posted: April 22 2008, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: April 15 2008, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: May 15 2008, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 80509857
View Document:  View as format xml

View Comment

This pertains to the control of volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions by establishing reasonable available control technology (RACT) requirements for marine vessel and barge loading. I would question why (RACT) is being considered and not (BACT) of (MACT). It seems that the (RACT) requirement would allow for <95% DRE. There is (BACT) Best available control technology in the industry that may not be cost effective, however is allows for >99% DRE. There is also (MACT) most achievable control technology that is cost effective and is > 99.9% DRE. Open flares = 95% DRE under $100,000 in cost Thermal Oxidizers = 99% DRE Over $ 200,000 in cost Ventura or fume oxidizers = 99.9% DRE at $100,000 in cost The Ventura or fume oxidizers should be considering as they can be tested unlike open flares and for a slightly higher capital and 99.9% DRE is achievable.

Related Comments

   
Total: 1
Public Comment from Robert Vandenberg on FR Doc # E8-08005
Public Submission    Posted: 04/22/2008     ID: EPA-R03-OAR-2007-1120-0006

May 15,2008 11:59 PM ET