This pertains to the control of volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions by
establishing reasonable available control technology (RACT) requirements for
marine vessel and barge loading.
I would question why (RACT) is being considered and not (BACT) of (MACT). It
seems that the (RACT) requirement would allow for <95% DRE. There is (BACT)
Best available control technology in the industry that may not be cost effective,
however is allows for >99% DRE. There is also (MACT) most achievable control
technology that is cost effective and is > 99.9% DRE.
Open flares = 95% DRE under $100,000 in cost
Thermal Oxidizers = 99% DRE Over $ 200,000 in cost
Ventura or fume oxidizers = 99.9% DRE at $100,000 in cost
The Ventura or fume oxidizers should be considering as they can be tested unlike
open flares and for a slightly higher capital and 99.9% DRE is achievable.
Public Comment from Robert Vandenberg on FR Doc # E8-08005
This is comment on Proposed Rule
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Maryland; Reasonably Available Control Technology Requirements for Marine Vessel and Barge Loading
View Comment
Related Comments
Public Submission Posted: 04/22/2008 ID: EPA-R03-OAR-2007-1120-0006
May 15,2008 11:59 PM ET