Supplemental comment from Barry Gilbert

Document ID: EPA-R05-OAR-2006-0517-0009
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Environmental Protection Agency
Received Date: January 12 2007, at 04:46 PM Eastern Standard Time
Date Posted: January 12 2007, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: December 7 2006, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: January 8 2007, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 801f4373
View Document:

This is comment on Proposed Rule

Proposed Approval Redesignating the Grand Rapids, Kalamazoo-Battle Creek, Lansing-East Lansing, Benzie County, Huron County, and Mason County, Michigan 8-Hour Ozone Nonattainment Areas to Attainment

View Comment

Barry Gilbert <box4411-envirodata@yahoo.com> 12/18/2006 05:58 PM Please respond to box4411-envirodata@yahoo.com To Louise Gross/R5/USEPA/US@EPA cc Subject Re: Fort Wayne questions Louise, Hope you are feeling better. I think we are finished with Fort Wayne. A question on Michican. How am I going to respond to the notice if I don't have a clue why you used an analysis (to show the area has put on controls) that clearly shows the area is in trouble. In other words, we would have used the analysis to show the area needed more controls when we designate the area nonattainment for the 8-hr std? I just don't get the logic since it was not explained in the notice. Barry

Related Comments

View All

Total: 9

Citizen comment via e-mail
Public Submission Posted: 01/12/2007 ID: EPA-R05-OAR-2006-0517-0007