Bath, Ohio resident comment on Cleveland 8-hour Ozone Redesignation

Document ID: EPA-R05-OAR-2009-0221-0007
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Environmental Protection Agency
Received Date: July 13 2009, at 08:57 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Date Posted: July 14 2009, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: June 12 2009, at 10:30 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: July 13 2009, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 809efe74
View Document:  View as format xml

View Comment

I am a resident of Bath, Ohio and am concerned with the particulate and ozone level concentration in our enviroment.One direct cause of air polution is open burning. I fail to understand why it is necessary for residents to burn an outdoor fire in their backyards or on their decks at night, especially when we are in high ozone warnings. The two most adverse results of recreational burning are: 1) The addition of direct CO2 2) The necessity of neighbors for long distances to use their home air conditioners a) to decrease temperatures in their homes instead of using the cool night air b) to avoid breathing the harsh smoke fumes c) to prevent our homes from becoming smoke damaged In addition, I know for a fact, that these fires are used to dispose of green shurb trimming as well as disposing of other sources of debris. Air conditioning alone is a large source of unnecessary power usage in a climate such as northeast Ohio. Why are fires considered recreational anyway?

Related Comments

   
Total: 3
Comment on FR Doc # E9-13853
Public Submission    Posted: 06/24/2009     ID: EPA-R05-OAR-2009-0221-0005

Jul 13,2009 11:59 PM ET
NRDC comments on the Proposed Approval of the Cleveland, Ohio 8-hour Ozone Redesignation
Public Submission    Posted: 07/14/2009     ID: EPA-R05-OAR-2009-0221-0006

Jul 13,2009 11:59 PM ET
Bath, Ohio resident comment on Cleveland 8-hour Ozone Redesignation
Public Submission    Posted: 07/14/2009     ID: EPA-R05-OAR-2009-0221-0007

Jul 13,2009 11:59 PM ET