Comment on FR Doc # 2012-20777

Document ID: EPA-R09-OAR-2010-1078-0028
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Environmental Protection Agency
Received Date: September 21 2012, at 12:00 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Date Posted: September 25 2012, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: August 23 2012, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: September 24 2012, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 81122e07
View Document:  View as format xml

View Comment

Being a concerned citizen about higher pollution levels here in Desert Hot Springs and in the Coachella Valley, I strongly object to CPV's Sentinel Energy Plant going online in the near future. First of all, you have adjusted the offset credits to a point where the plant can now be allowed to be built. How is it possible that this can occur given that these credits are very outdated? They go back many years, particularly those from the Seagull Sanitation landfill operation. Is this normal that the EPA will issue these credits from a highly polluting trash-"burning" operation in order to allow a PM10 and PM2.5 micron emitting plant in Desert Hot Springs, one of the worst already polluted areas in Southern California? Secondly, I can't see how offset reduction credits derived from an operation so far from where I live can be applied here. How is it that these can make our air-quality much better here? I fail to see the reasoning. According to the Clean Air Act, the transfer of credits is to be used to assist us in generating cleaner air. Isn't this so? Finally, I know I do not speak alone when I say I have special health concerns about this plant. I am a lung cancer survivor and I know that the pollutants going into the air here if the plant goes online could easily throw me into a relapse situation which means, basically, my number is up. Many children with asthma and Senior Citizens suffering from respiratory and pulmonary afflictions will also be adversely affected. I ask that you do not rule favorably on the offset credits which would enable the CPV Sentinel Plant to go online. Besides being too old, they would do nothing to mitigate pollution levels here. Sincerely, Darel Propst 66173 8th. St. Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240 1(760)329-6864

Related Comments

    View All
Total: 13
Comment on FR Doc # 2012-20777
Public Submission    Posted: 09/25/2012     ID: EPA-R09-OAR-2010-1078-0028

Sep 24,2012 11:59 PM ET
Comment on FR Doc # 2012-20777
Public Submission    Posted: 09/25/2012     ID: EPA-R09-OAR-2010-1078-0030

Sep 24,2012 11:59 PM ET
Comment on FR Doc # 2012-20777
Public Submission    Posted: 09/25/2012     ID: EPA-R09-OAR-2010-1078-0031

Sep 24,2012 11:59 PM ET
Comment on FR Doc # 2012-20777
Public Submission    Posted: 09/25/2012     ID: EPA-R09-OAR-2010-1078-0033

Sep 24,2012 11:59 PM ET
Comment on FR Doc # 2012-20777
Public Submission    Posted: 09/25/2012     ID: EPA-R09-OAR-2010-1078-0034

Sep 24,2012 11:59 PM ET