Comment on FR Doc # 2012-17659

Document ID: EPA-R09-OAR-2012-0021-0017
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Environmental Protection Agency
Received Date: August 16 2012, at 12:00 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Date Posted: August 16 2012, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: July 20 2012, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: August 31 2012, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 810df80c
View Document:  View as format xml

View Comment

This proposed rule would be a bad idea given that we are already a small community and the job loss would devistate everything. Also, how much do you want to pay for electricity. How can this even be considered an option. How about looking into pollution in Phoenix and California????

Related Comments

    View All
Total: 138
Comment on FR Doc # 2012-17659
Public Submission    Posted: 08/16/2012     ID: EPA-R09-OAR-2012-0021-0014

Aug 31,2012 11:59 PM ET
Comment on FR Doc # 2012-17659
Public Submission    Posted: 08/16/2012     ID: EPA-R09-OAR-2012-0021-0016

Aug 31,2012 11:59 PM ET
Comment on FR Doc # 2012-17659
Public Submission    Posted: 08/16/2012     ID: EPA-R09-OAR-2012-0021-0017

Aug 31,2012 11:59 PM ET
I-06 Comment on FR Doc # 2012-17659
Public Submission    Posted: 09/26/2012     ID: EPA-R09-OAR-2012-0021-0035

Aug 31,2012 11:59 PM ET
I-07 Comment on FR Doc # 2012-17659
Public Submission    Posted: 09/26/2012     ID: EPA-R09-OAR-2012-0021-0036

Aug 31,2012 11:59 PM ET