Comment on FR Doc # 2013-06196

Document ID: EPA-R09-OAR-2013-0009-0048
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Environmental Protection Agency
Received Date: April 04 2013, at 12:00 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Date Posted: April 5 2013, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: March 19 2013, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: August 5 2013, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 1jx-84l4-6m9l
View Document:  View as format xml

View Comment

TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Give more consideration to the economic impacts that the ruling will have on water users, agriculture, Tribal interests and water policy in Arizona. Take a closer look at the scientific studies, including those from the U.S. Department of Energy, showing that NGS does not have a significant impact on regional haze as the EPA has stated in its rule. Recognize that there are other sources of emissions with far greater impacts on visibility in the area of the Grand Canyon than NGS. Provide more time for people to review and understand the impacts of the rule and to provide comment to EPA.

Related Comments

    View All
Total: 29
Comment on FR Doc # 2013-06196
Public Submission    Posted: 04/05/2013     ID: EPA-R09-OAR-2013-0009-0048

Aug 05,2013 11:59 PM ET
2013_0307 Letter from Senators Flake and McCain on NGS
Public Submission    Posted: 06/06/2013     ID: EPA-R09-OAR-2013-0009-0087

Aug 05,2013 11:59 PM ET
2013_0524 Comment from Frank Jones
Public Submission    Posted: 06/06/2013     ID: EPA-R09-OAR-2013-0009-0090

Aug 05,2013 11:59 PM ET
Comment from Janice Berger, dated April 14, 2013, via email.
Public Submission    Posted: 04/18/2013     ID: EPA-R09-OAR-2013-0009-0056

Aug 05,2013 11:59 PM ET
Comment from Sid Abma, Sidel Systems, dated April 15, 2013, via email.
Public Submission    Posted: 04/18/2013     ID: EPA-R09-OAR-2013-0009-0057

Aug 05,2013 11:59 PM ET