Comment on FR Doc # E9-22208

Document ID: EPA-R10-OAR-2008-0690-0006
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Environmental Protection Agency
Received Date: September 19 2009, at 12:00 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Date Posted: September 28 2009, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: September 15 2009, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: October 15 2009, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 80a2873b
View Document:  View as format xml

View Comment

After a minimum of study of problems associated with PM 2.5, I have become concerned that perhaps the IM program should not be done away with until all sources of PM 2.5 can be analyzed. In fact I would be in favor of the immediate expansion of the present program to include diesel vehicles. I am concerned about the considerable health risks that the medical community indicates attributable to PM 2.5. The exisience and effects of PM2.5 makes perfect sense. I applaud the Agency for their desire to lighten the burden of government on the citizens of FNSB. However the health risks here seem to far outweigh the benefits to citizens by doing away with the program.

Related Comments

    View All
Total: 8
Comment on FR Doc # E9-22208
Public Submission    Posted: 09/28/2009     ID: EPA-R10-OAR-2008-0690-0006

Oct 15,2009 11:59 PM ET
Comment on FR Doc # E9-22208
Public Submission    Posted: 10/14/2009     ID: EPA-R10-OAR-2008-0690-0007

Oct 15,2009 11:59 PM ET
Comment on FR Doc # N/A
Public Submission    Posted: 10/15/2009     ID: EPA-R10-OAR-2008-0690-0009

Oct 15,2009 11:59 PM ET
Comment on FR Doc # E9-22208
Public Submission    Posted: 10/15/2009     ID: EPA-R10-OAR-2008-0690-0010

Oct 15,2009 11:59 PM ET
Comment on FR Doc # E9-22208
Public Submission    Posted: 10/15/2009     ID: EPA-R10-OAR-2008-0690-0011

Oct 15,2009 11:59 PM ET