Comment on FR Doc # 2010-16775

Document ID: EPA-R10-OPPT-2010-0549-0007
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Environmental Protection Agency
Received Date: August 05 2010, at 12:00 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Date Posted: August 27 2010, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: July 9 2010, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: August 23 2010, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 80b2a3ba
View Document:  View as format xml

View Comment

I am writing about the 40CFR 745 1. I believe un occupied units should not have to fall under this ruling 2. Removal of carpet should not fall under this ruling 3. Someone must evaluate the amount of plastic that will be used and disposed and the impact that will have on the enviroment. Consideriing that plastic is a petroleum based product , we will be impacting the enviroment more with this abusive wast than we would with the standard pracices of removing and demolition. 4.Pressure washing of buildings and the impact of lead I believe needs to be studied further and to weigh the additional waste of plastic, the use od dessicants and the end disposal into land fill. I thinke the findings woudl be more detrimental to the enviroment than the possible lead that may be removed. 5.Availibility of certain materials required is limited and must be more readily available before enforcement can take place.

Related Comments

   
Total: 1
Comment on FR Doc # 2010-16775
Public Submission    Posted: 08/27/2010     ID: EPA-R10-OPPT-2010-0549-0007

Aug 23,2010 11:59 PM ET