After carefully reading the proposed rule change for Temporary Labor Certification,
I noticed a huge inconsistency. The stated reasons for making the change are
due mainly to the increase in applications,which according to INS and the DOL
have risen 129% since the year 2000. Without the “exemption” for returning
workers provided by the Save Our Small and Seasonal business act, it would
seem apparent that there would be a significant decrease in applications for
temporary workers due to numerical cap of 66,000. Without an increase in the
numerical cap or a return of the “exemption” it doesn’t make sense that an
increase in applications would continue.
While we are not philosophically opposed to the changes and to the proposed
increase in application/administration filing fees. We do feel that any legislation
submitted by the Department of Labor to Congress in order increase these fee’s
must also include significant increases in the numerical cap ( at minimum
132,000 new workers) or reapply the “exemption” as Proposed in the Save our
Small and Seasonal businesses Act of 2007.
Without changes to the numerical limits, changes to the process will be pointless.
DHI llc - Holloway, James
This is comment on Proposed Rule
Labor Certification Process and Enforcement for Temporary Employment in Occupations Other Than Agriculture or Registered Nursing in the United States (H-2B Workers), and Other Technical Changes
View Comment
Related Comments
View AllPublic Submission Posted: 06/12/2008 ID: ETA-2008-0002-0003
Jul 07,2008 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 06/12/2008 ID: ETA-2008-0002-0004
Jul 07,2008 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 06/12/2008 ID: ETA-2008-0002-0005
Jul 07,2008 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 06/12/2008 ID: ETA-2008-0002-0006
Jul 07,2008 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 06/12/2008 ID: ETA-2008-0002-0007
Jul 07,2008 11:59 PM ET