Ronald Judy

Document ID: FAA-2006-26408-0235
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Federal Aviation Administration
Received Date: September 17 2012, at 12:00 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Date Posted: September 18 2012, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: August 17 2012, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: November 19 2012, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 81119004
View Document:

This is comment on Proposed Rule

Repair Stations; Comment Period Extension

View Comment

I see a few things in the proposal that simplify things for the Repair Stations, but most of it is an added burden in cost and time. It accomplishes nothing in regard to aircraft safety. Why don't you simplify or eliminate a lot of the requirements and paperwork a Repair Station is burdened with? This is another "make work" proposal that will require more FAA employees and accomplish nothing. One very unnecessary part of the proposal is the 24 month renewal requirement. As long as we pass the yearly audit, what does renewal accomplish except generate more paperwork? The bottom line of the NPRM is that it just drives another nail in the coffin of General Aviation. Drop it and come up with a proposal to reduce the requirements of part 145.