Michael Donahue

Document ID: FAA-2007-0047-0002
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Federal Aviation Administration
Received Date: November 08 2007, at 05:34 PM Eastern Standard Time
Date Posted: November 9 2007, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: October 17 2007, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: November 16 2007, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 8036207a
View Document:  View as format xml

View Comment

In reviewing the proposed superseding AD to AD 2007-17-07, I have the following comments: Proposed paragraph (g)(3) I do not believe this should be required. Bombardier and the flap actuator manufacturer (Eaton) are very close to certifying a new seal for the flap actuator. This is to fix the internal fluid leakage issue in the actuator which could result in an actuator problem (and result in the actuator failing the low temperature torque test). Once this is certified, a fleet retrofit with the modified actuator would result in a more robust fix for the actuator issue. There is no guarantee currently that a replacement actuator installed to replace an actuator failing the low temperature torque test would not have the same issue shortly after installation (negating the benefit of performing the test). The flight operations requirements instituted under AD 2007-17-07 provide an acceptable margin of safety until the modified actuator becomes available for retrofit. Mike Donahue Chief Engineer Mesaba Airlines

Related Comments

   
Total: 4
Michael Donahue
Public Submission    Posted: 11/09/2007     ID: FAA-2007-0047-0002

Nov 16,2007 11:59 PM ET
James W. Bender
Public Submission    Posted: 11/09/2007     ID: FAA-2007-0047-0003

Nov 16,2007 11:59 PM ET
Larry Nelson
Public Submission    Posted: 11/16/2007     ID: FAA-2007-0047-0005

Nov 16,2007 11:59 PM ET
Northwest Airlines
Public Submission    Posted: 11/21/2007     ID: FAA-2007-0047-0006

Nov 16,2007 11:59 PM ET